
Peer Review Policy
Publication of articles in Solusi is dependent solely on scientific validity and coherence as judged by our editors and/or peer reviewers, who will also assess whether the writing is comprehensible and whether the work represents a useful contribution to the field. Solusi acknowledged the effort and suggestions made by its reviewers.
Initial evaluation of manuscripts
The Editor will first evaluate all manuscripts submitted. Although rare, yet it is entirely feasible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. Those rejected at this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, or are outside the aims and scope of the Solusi. Those that meet the minimum criteria are passed on to experts for review.
Type of peer review
Review process employs a double blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.
Review reports
Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
Decision
Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.
Becoming a Reviewer
If you are not currently a reviewer for Solusi, but would like to be added to the list of reviewers, please contact us. The benefits of reviewing for Solusi include the opportunity to see and evaluate the latest work in related research area at an early stage, and to be acknowledged in our list of reviewers. You may also be able to cite your work for Solusi as part of your professional development requirements.
Editorial Office
Faculty of Law, University of Palembang
OJS: https://jurnal.unpal.ac.id/index.php/solusi
Email: solusi@unpal.ac.id/ solusiunpal@gmail.com
Solusi by jurnal.unpal.ac.id/index.php/solusi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.